What Is Hacktivism: Its Purposes and Methods

What is Hacktivism? Hacktivism Definition and Meaning

Hacktivism combines the words “hacking” and “activism” and uses hacking techniques and disruptive cyberattacks to promote a political or social cause rather than for profit. The term “hacktivism” was first coined in 1996 by a member of the hacker collective “Cult of the Dead Cow” known as “Omega”. Early hacktivists saw their computer skills as tools for civil disobedience.

Unlike malicious hackers who seek profit or espionage, hacktivist groups rally around themes like:

• Freedom of speech
• Human rights
• Opposition to censorship
• Anti-corruption
• Anti-war movements

Hacktivists use cyberattacks or denial-of-service (DoS) attacks to make political statements, expose what they consider wrongdoing, or pressure entities such as governments and corporations to change policies.

While their methods overlap with those of cybercriminals, hacktivists justify them as a form of protest that highlights important issues and challenges powerful institutions. Hacktivist attacks also involve unauthorized breaches, causing extensive collateral damage.

How Hacktivism Works

Hacktivists operate openly and collaboratively. They often claim credit online for their attacks and publicize the results to maximize awareness and rally supporters.

Hacktivist groups are also notoriously active on social networks (including X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Telegram, Matrix, and Discord). These channels include information about the group’s principles and goals, reports of attacks that have taken place, tools for carrying out attacks, and more.

Anyone can participate by posting with unique hashtags used for specific types of attacks: #TangoDown for DDoS, #deface for Deface attacks, #leak for data leaks.

Below, we’ll dive deeper into these approaches and explore how a typical hacktivist campaign unfolds.

1. Decentralized organization

Hacktivist groups are exceptionally resilient because of their decentralized nature. They operate without a formal hierarchy or “commander”. Many are collectives united by an idea. For example, “Anonymous” is an indefinite movement rather than a single entity.

How it works:

Hacktivist groups can keep operating even after some members leave because they are distributed and subject to constant member turnover.

• Cells or sub-groups within a movement can also operate semi-independently, pursuing local objectives while still flying the same banner.
• Hacktivist campaigns can be long-running, with waves of activity flaring up as new events spark outrage.

2. Social media coordination

Hacktivists leverage social media to coordinate and publicize operations.

How it works:

• Hacktivists launch social media channels and websites that share the group’s principles and goals.
• These channels may also publish reports about attacks and tools for carrying them out.
• Their openness on social media helps campaigns gain traction quickly, where a hashtag or viral post can recruit thousands of new operatives overnight.

3. Open recruitment and crowdsourcing

Hacktivist initiatives are usually crowdsourced and call on volunteers, also known as digital mobs or hacktivist swarms.

How it works:

• Anyone sympathetic to the cause can pitch in since launching a basic DDoS (or sharing a leaked file link) doesn’t require deep technical knowledge.
• Campaign organizers develop user-friendly tools or scripts to lower the barrier to entry.

4. Collective anonymity and mass participation

Hacktivists act under the concept of “we are legion”, making it harder for authorities and security analysts to identify each participant among a crowd.

How it works:

• Many conceal their identities using aliases (e.g., handles like “CyberJustice” or “AnonOps124”) and use VPNs or Tor to hide their IP addresses.
• The significant damage from hacktivist attacks stems from the large number of attackers and simultaneous actions, such as coordinated DDoS attacks.
• Collective attacks also add another layer of protection, with many believing that the risk of being caught is minimal.

5. Media leverage

Hacktivists work with an eye toward public relations; a defacement or data leak is only as valuable as the attention it gets. To gain maximum press coverage, hacktivists tip off media outlets or boast on public channels about their exploits.

How it works:

• Hacktivists package stolen data into media-friendly releases (e.g., creating a website of leaked emails to facilitate journalists).
• They try to control the narrative and ensure their message (not just the illegal act) reaches the public by courting the press and dominating social media chatter.
• This propaganda of the deed and increased public scrutiny sometimes backfire, causing security lapses and harsh retaliation from authorities.

Based on 1550+ high-tech crime investigations, our digital forensics experts have observed that leaking sensitive information or compromising channels can unmask individual members.

Explore Group-IB’s list of the “Top 10 Masked Actors for 2025” for insights into the impact of hacktivist and ransomware operations across sectors and geographies.

A Brief History of Hacktivism

The roots of hacktivism trace back to the late 20th century, with peaks corresponding to political events and technological changes. Key milestones in hacktivism’s history include:

1989 – The WANK Worm

The “Worms Against Nuclear Killers (WANK)” worm is often cited as one of the earliest examples of hacktivism. In October 1989, it spread through NASA’s Space Physics Analysis Network and Department of Energy systems, showing an anti-nuclear message on infected terminals. The timing was pointed. Days later, NASA launched the Galileo probe, which carried plutonium fuel and had drawn anti-nuclear protest.

Despite the alarming display, the worm did not destroy data. It told users their files were being deleted while leaving them untouched, and locked people out by changing passwords. The disruption still cost NASA an estimated $500,000 in lost time and cleanup. No one was ever conclusively identified.

1990s – “Web Sit-Ins” and Hacktivism

Throughout the mid-90s, the “Cult of the Dead Cow” and its offshoots (like Hacktivism) advocated for information freedom. In 1998, a group called the “Electronic Disturbance Theater” staged virtual sit-ins by directing web traffic to overload servers of the Mexican government.

2008 – Project Chanology

This was an important campaign by the nascent collective “Anonymous” against the Church of Scientology.

Triggered by the Church’s attempt to censor online content, Anonymous members coordinated DDoS attacks on Scientology websites, prank-called its offices, and flooded it with black faxes, alongside in-person street protests by supporters in Guy Fawkes masks.

2010 – Operation Payback

In late 2010, when financial companies like PayPal, Visa, and MasterCard cut off services to WikiLeaks, Anonymous retaliated with a series of large DDoS attacks dubbed “Operation Payback.”

Hacktivists temporarily shut down those companies’ websites to protest what they saw as censorship. Earlier in 2010, Operation Payback had begun as attacks on anti-piracy organizations, but it morphed into a pro-WikiLeaks campaign (also called Operation Avenge Assange) after the WikiLeaks banking blockade.

Mid-2010s – Crackdowns

Law enforcement arrested several prominent Anonymous and LulzSec members around 2012–2013, which sowed mistrust and quieted some operations.

2024 – Political Hacktivism

Most hacktivism today is politically motivated and spikes around global conflicts. Targets often extend beyond direct participants to any organization seen as taking a side.

Group-IB’s High-Tech Crime Trends 2025 show that government and military organizations were the most-targeted sector, followed by financial services and education. Regionally, Asia-Pacific and Europe absorbed most attacks, at roughly 39% and 36%.

The trend has continued well into 2026. In Asia-Pacific, Group-IB logged 118 DDoS and hacktivism incidents in May 2026 alone, nearly double the month before.

Anonymous

Anonymous groups are decentralized, ideological, unpredictable, and capable of attacks ranging from pranks to serious breaches. Their use of social media and dramatic video press releases set the template for modern hacktivist communications.

While its activity has fluctuated over time, subgroups of Anonymous still surface today, and their name continues to surface in connection with hacktivism. Anonymous recruits use different hashtags depending on the campaign.

Types of Hacktivism: Attack Methods

Common attack methods include DDoS attacks to render resources inaccessible, defacing websites to promote the group’s ideas or positions, and publishing compromised data.

Hacktivists also communicate through encrypted channels and share open-source digital tools or guides so that others can join the cyber campaign. The main goal is to damage opponents’ reputations or disable their resources.

We’ll explore the significant types of hacktivism and attack methods in more detail below.

1. Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)

Overwhelming a target website or service with traffic from many sources, forcing it offline.

Hacktivist DDoS campaigns (often announced with the hashtag #TangoDown), have been among the most frequent and impactful, as even relatively unskilled volunteers can join in flooding a site.

2. Website defacement

After the United States killed Iranian general Qasem Soleimani in January 2020, pro-Iran hacktivists defaced dozens of U.S.-hosted websites, replacing their pages with images of Soleimani and slogans such as “Down with America.” The U.S. Department of Justice later charged two men in connection with the campaign. 

3. Data theft and information leaks

Hackers break into systems to steal confidential information, then publish it openly (on leak websites, Pastebin, Telegram, etc.) to damage reputation or expose wrongdoing.

Data leak operations aim to reveal internal email addresses, customer records, or classified documents that can scandalize the target organization. Whistleblowers might also leak data aligned with hacktivist goals, as seen in 2010 when U.S. diplomatic cables were passed to WikiLeaks and published by Julian Assange.

4. Doxing

Publishing private or identifying information about individuals involved with the target (such as personal addresses, emails, or documents) as a form of public shaming or intimidation.

Hacktivists may dox officials, police, executives, or other figures they oppose, claiming it as a way to hold them accountable. This attack method blurs the line between whistleblowing and harassment and is illegal.

5. URL/Traffic Hijacking

Manipulating internet traffic or DNS settings to redirect users from a legitimate site to another page that delivers the hacktivist’s message.

Hacktivists can hijack a company’s subdomain and redirect users to a page with protest content, or poison DNS entries so that a government website loads a parody page.

6. Anonymous blogging and information distribution

Using anonymous content, paste sites, or social media accounts to spread propaganda, leaked information, or calls to action.

Website mirroring is a related tactic in which online activists create copies of censored sites or paywalled content to keep it accessible. One example is the RECAP browser extension, designed to automatically copy U.S. federal court documents from PACER and repost them for free online.

Motivations Behind Hacktivism

Hacktivism is politically or socially motivated hacking. It’s driven by outrage, idealism, or a desire to raise awareness. As Group-IB researchers note, hacktivist causes range from fighting terrorism and bypassing censorship to promoting democracy and undermining authoritarianism.

Here are some common motivations that explain why hacktivists attack:

1. Political Protest and Dissent

Many hacktivist attacks are cyber-protests against government actions, laws, or policies.

This includes:

• Speaking out against wars, government corruption, authoritarian regimes, or controversial legislation.
• Opposing sides of a political conflict hack websites to spread propaganda or protest military actions.

2. Freedom of Information and Anti-Censorship

Many hacktivists are motivated by free speech and open access to personal information.

This includes:

• Exposing secrets or removing barriers to information by attacking government infrastructure.
• Leaking documents to expose surveillance, as when a hacktivist known as Phineas Fisher breached the spyware vendor Hacking Team in 2015 and revealed it had sold spyware to authoritarian governments. WikiLeaks later published the emails.
• Mirror sites and tools to bypass the “Great Firewall,” championing uncensored internet access as a human right.

3. Human rights and social justice

Hacktivists often rally behind human rights causes, political causes, a form of civil disobedience, and social movements as a form of vigilante justice against hate and terror. Some hacktivists have even pursued goals like disrupting terrorists’ online presence or aiding migrants.

This includes targeting entities accused of human rights abuses, assisting refugees by hacking and exposing human trafficking rings, and helping political dissidents in oppressive countries communicate securely.

4. Anti-corporate activism

Hacktivism can also target corporations, especially those perceived as unethical.

This includes:

• Punishing companies involved in scandals, such as leaking data from a company engaged in environmental destruction, or defacing a brand’s website over labor abuses.
• The Ashley Madison breach, where hackers exposed a dating site’s user base, was justified by the perpetrators as condemning the company’s immoral business.
• Attacks on financial institutions as part of the Occupy Wall Street movement, or operations against pharma companies and others accused of harmful practices.

Hacktivists also create unintended yet serious consequences for ordinary users. Disrupting critical services, such as healthcare portals, financial services, or government websites, can prevent people from accessing urgent medical records, online banking, or public resources.

Likewise, data leaks intended to expose wrongdoing can compromise the privacy and safety of innocent individuals.

Tactics and Tools of Hacktivists

Hacktivists often use free, publicly available tools included in common distributions for penetration testing and exploiting vulnerabilities in legacy services.  Some groups develop proprietary software or create repositories of scripts and tools for other hacktivists, lowering the technical barrier and encouraging large-scale participation.

We’ll explore these tactics and tools in more detail below.

1. Publicly Available Tools

Hacktivists use open-source or freeware programs that anyone can download.

Examples of some high-profile attacks:

• The Low Orbit Ion Cannon (LOIC) was originally a stress-testing tool that Anonymous repurposed for DDoS (Denial-of-Service attacks. Similar tools exist for computer network flooding, vulnerability scanning, and password cracking, requiring minimal technical expertise.
• Other open-source utilities include dirsearch (for discovering hidden files and directories), sqlmap (for automating SQL injection attacks), redis-rogue-getshell (for exploiting Redis servers), and Cobalt Strike (for post-exploitation activities).
• Hacktivists also favor penetration-testing distributions, like Kali Linux, loaded with exploit tools.

2. Exploiting known vulnerabilities

Hacktivists prefer to exploit legacy or well-known security gaps in websites and systems rather than developing custom malware or leveraging zero-day exploits.

Examples:

• If a website runs an outdated CMS, a hacktivist can use a known exploit (copy-pasted from forums or GitHub) to deface the site or steal data.
• SQL injection and cross-site scripting attacks are used to dump databases or alter web content. Organizations with poor patch management often become low-hanging fruit.
• In late 2023, the hacktivist group CyberAv3ngers hijacked internet-exposed Unitronics programmable logic controllers (PLCs) at U.S. water utilities and other sites, exploiting only the default passwords left on the devices. CISA later counted at least 75 compromised devices.

3. Botnets

To conduct larger DDoS attacks, hacktivists deploy botnets. They may call on volunteers to contribute their devices, which is easier and cheaper than building a typical malware botnet.

Examples:

• Participants can run code or join a DDoS coordination platform that turns their device into one of many hitting the target.
• Other hacktivist groups have created scripts that repeatedly reload target URLs or send junk requests, which were later shared on Telegram for supporters to run.

4. Script repositories

Experienced hacktivists may prepare tutorials, toolkits, and scripts for recruits.

Examples:

• They maintain GitHub repositories with custom scripts to automate specific attacks, or write how-to guides (“paste this command to join the attack”).
• Some hacktivist campaigns include web-based attack panels where users click a button to launch an attack on listed targets directly.
• Downloadable “IP stressor” tools configured with targets, so anyone could run them to initiate attacks with limited technical knowledge.

5. Anonymity tools

Hacktivists rely on privacy tools like VPN services, proxy chains, and the Tor network to protect from identity theft and mask IP addresses. Decentralized VPNs (dVPNs) with strong encryption (Mysterium Network, Orchid, or Sentinel) also make it harder to betray users’ privacy.

Examples:

• Hacktivists use encrypted messaging platforms like Telegram, Signal, or IRC (Internet Relay Chat) to prevent unauthorized access.
• Virtual machines and Tails OS (The Amnesic Incognito Live System), a privacy-focused operating system that runs without installation, ensure minimal digital traces.
• Privacy coins such as Monero, or crypto mixers, obscure the flow of funds and let hacktivists accept donations or move money without exposing their networks

6. Evasion tactics

Group-IB’s investigations, reported in the 2025 High-Tech Crime Trends, reveal that modern hacktivist groups have adopted sophisticated methods and tools to evade detection from traditional security defenses.

Examples:

• Rotating through extensive lists of proxy servers, VPNs, or botnets to obscure the origin of their traffic and bypass IP-based blocking.
• DDoS attacks increasingly target the application layer (Layer 7) to overwhelm web applications, rather than flooding the network layer with raw traffic that is easier to detect and filter. The IT Army of Ukraine claimed to have created a special program that bypasses Russian anti-DDoS filters by mimicking legitimate traffic.
• Embedding false linguistic or geopolitical clues within malware to delay effective response by security teams and law enforcement.

7. Proprietary Software

Some hacktivist groups have developed custom malware, wiper viruses, DDoS platforms, and leak sites to target specific individuals or organizations.

Examples:

• In 2023, a hacktivist group created a new Linux wiper malware to attack organizations. Another hacktivist group repurposed leaked Conti ransomware source code as a wiper to destroy data.
• A hacktivist collective, “NoName057(16)”, developed a crowdsourced DDoS platform called DDosia. Publicized on the group’s Telegram channel, the hacktivists gamified the bot program by offering cryptocurrency bounties for taking down government and media websites. In July 2025, Europol’s Operation Eastwood struck back, taking more than 100 of the group’s servers offline, making arrests, and warning 1,100 participants that they faced criminal liability.
• A customized leak site to expose stolen personal details of military and security personnel.

Hacktivists also employ obfuscation and encryption techniques for their malware payloads to avoid detection by antivirus and intrusion detection systems. These tactics include using packers, encrypting payloads with custom keys, or injecting malicious code into legitimate processes. Conventional sandboxes often miss these tricks.

Group-IB Malware Detonation detonates suspicious files and links in isolated virtual machines and is built to defeat exactly this kind of evasion, with anti-evasion technology, retrospective analysis, and support for 290+ object formats. Delivered as part of Group-IB Managed XDR and enriched with Threat Intelligence, it provides analysts with an in-depth view of a threat from initial infection to the final payload.

Hactivism Examples: Infamous Attacks by Hacktivist Groups

Below are several infamous hacktivism events that highlight the tactics and tools hacktivists use.

1. Operation Darknet

In 2011, an Anonymous campaign called Operation Darknet went after sites trading in child sexual abuse images on the Tor dark web. Anonymous knocked one of the largest sites, Lolita City, offline with a denial-of-service attack, then demanded the host remove the content. When the host firm refused, Anonymous broke into its network, shut down the servers, and published the names of about 1,500 people it said had used the site.

2. Ashley Madison Data Dump

In July 2015, “The Impact Team” hacked a Canadian dating site for married people and stole the details of 32 million users.

When the company refused to shut down, hacktivists published the entire user database on the dark web, provoking a mass divorce and/or heartbreak epidemic. They justified the data breach as morally motivated, calling out the site for profiteering from infidelity and deceit.

3. Panama Papers

In 2016, the world learned of the “Panama Papers,” a massive leak of offshore banking and shell company records from the law firm Mossack Fonseca.

An anonymous insider, known only as John Doe, leaked the documents from Mossack Fonseca to expose how the wealthy hid their assets. Hacktivists and journalists later used Signal, SecureDrop, VeraCrypt, and encrypted email to transfer and analyze massive volumes of data without detection.

4. Clinton Email Leaks

The 2016 Clinton email leaks looked like hacktivism but were a disguised state operation. Russian military intelligence (the GRU) broke into the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign, partly by phishing campaign chairman John Podesta into giving up his email password. US intelligence attributed the intrusion to the GRU’s Fancy Bear (APT28), with a separate breach by Cozy Bear (APT29).

The stolen emails were then staged to look like grassroots activism, surfacing through two hacktivist-style fronts the GRU had created, “Guccifer 2.0” and “DCLeaks,” and through WikiLeaks. The US Department of Justice later indicted 12 GRU officers over the operation. 

How Organizations Can Detect Hacktivist Activity

Organizations detect hacktivist activity by monitoring network traffic, website integrity, login patterns, and outbound data flows that are disrupted by hacktivist tactics. Because hacktivists often announce their targets on social media first, teams watching these four areas can catch a campaign early, while there is still time to contain it.

Monitoring unusual network traffic

DDoS is the most common hacktivist tactic, and both the attack and the scanning that precedes it show up in network data. The trick is knowing what normal looks like, so baseline your typical traffic and let deviations stand out, an approach CISA’s DDoS guidance also recommends. A few notable patterns:

• A sudden or sustained spike in traffic or bandwidth, especially against one service or URL.
• Requests concentrated among a small set of IP addresses, or a flood of requests that mimic real users (a Layer 7 attack).
• Sustained spikes in CPU, memory, or connection counts on public-facing servers.
• Port scanning or probing of internet-facing systems, which often comes before an attack.

A legitimate surge usually comes from many varied sources. An attack tends to hammer one target from unusual origins.

Detecting website and application changes

Defacement is a hacktivist signature, and the same monitoring that catches it also flags quieter tampering. Compare your live pages and files against a known-good baseline so unauthorized changes surface fast. Typical signs include:

• Unexpected changes to web page content, especially new political slogans, images, or messages.
• New or modified files on web servers, or admin accounts you did not create.
• Changes to your CMS, plugins, or themes that no one on the team made.
• Failed integrity checks on critical files or configurations.

File integrity monitoring is the practical tool here, alerting you the moment a protected file changes.

Identifying suspicious login activity

Hacktivists rarely need clever exploits when a default or stolen password will do, as the CyberAv3ngers water-utility attacks showed. That makes authentication logs one of the best early-warning systems. Log and alert on access to remote services like VPNs, RDP, and admin panels, and treat these as red flags.

• A spike in failed logins, which can signal brute-forcing or credential stuffing.
• Logins at unusual hours, or from countries and devices an account never uses.
• Impossible travel, where one account signs in from two distant locations minutes apart.
• Activity on dormant or default accounts that should not be in use.

CISA’s guidance for defenders facing pro-Russia hacktivists makes the same point, urging teams to log remote logins and flag failed attempts and odd timing.

Monitoring data exfiltration attempts

Doxing and data leaks start with data leaving your network, and that theft is easier to catch than to undo. Monitor outbound traffic as closely as inbound traffic, and investigate a few patterns.

• Large or unusual data transfers, particularly outside business hours.
• Data moving to unfamiliar destinations, such as paste sites, file-sharing services, or personal cloud storage.
• Bulk database queries or exports that do not match normal application behavior.
• Files being compressed or staged in one place before a transfer, a common pre-exfiltration step.

Data loss prevention and egress monitoring turn these patterns into alerts, ideally before anything reaches a public leak site.

How to Prepare for a Hacktivist Campaign

Organizations prepare for a hacktivist campaign by closing the weaknesses hacktivists target most, which means running regular vulnerability assessments, hardening internet-facing systems, deploying DDoS protection, and protecting sensitive data. Hacktivists favor known flaws and DDoS over novel exploits, so this preparation blunts most of what a campaign can do.

Conduct regular vulnerability assessments

Hacktivists lean on known, unpatched flaws rather than zero-days, so the vulnerabilities you find and fix first are the ones they would have used. Scan your internet-facing assets regularly and act on what you find.

• Prioritize vulnerabilities already being exploited in the wild, such as those in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
• Test your web applications for injection and misconfiguration flaws that hacktivists most often exploit.
• Track every internet-facing asset you own, including forgotten subdomains and services, so nothing sits exposed and unpatched.
• Fix or mitigate high-risk findings on a defined timeline rather than leaving them open.

Strengthen internet-facing systems

Anything you expose to the internet is a potential target, and hacktivists constantly scan for the weakest link. The CyberAv3ngers water-utility attacks succeeded only because of internet-exposed devices left with default passwords. Harden that surface first.

• Change all default and weak passwords, and enforce multifactor authentication for remote access and admin accounts.
• Take systems that do not need to face the internet offline, and put the rest behind a firewall or VPN.
• Patch internet-facing software and devices promptly, since attackers probe these first.
• Restrict access with IP allowlists and network segmentation so a single foothold does not open everything.

Implement DDoS protection

DDoS is the tactic hacktivists reach for most, and because volunteers can join a flood with almost no skill, even a modest group can knock an unprepared site offline. Build in resilience before you need it.

• Put a DDoS mitigation service or content delivery network in front of public-facing services to absorb and filter attack traffic.
• Use rate limiting and traffic filtering to drop obvious floods at the edge.
• Keep enough bandwidth headroom and load balancing to ride out a surge.
• Agree on a response plan with your ISP and internal teams in advance so no one improvises during an attack.

Protect sensitive and critical data

Doxing and data leaks only work if there is data worth stealing and it is easy to reach. Limit both how much an attacker can take and how useful what they take is.

• Encrypt sensitive data at rest and in transit, so a copy is far less damaging if it leaks.
• Enforce least-privilege access so that no single compromised account can access everything.
• Reduce what you hold, retiring or archiving personal and sensitive data you no longer need.
• Keep tested, offline backups, which also blunt the wiper malware some hacktivist groups deploy.

How to Counter Hacktivist Attacks

Hacktivist campaigns run in the open and move fast. Targets are named on Telegram, and a defacement or DDoS can follow within hours, most often targeting government and financial organizations at the top of the hacktivist target list. 

Countering them takes visibility into what attackers can see and say about you, and the speed to act before a campaign lands. This is where Group-IB’s Digital Risk Protection, Attack Surface Management, and Threat Intelligence solutions work together.

• Digital Risk Protection monitors social media, domains, the dark web, marketplaces, and public and private feeds for hacktivist chatter and impersonation, and automatically takes down malicious infrastructure.
• Attack Surface Management discovers and assesses your exposed assets, so you can close the gaps hacktivists scan for before they find them.
• Threat Intelligence tracks hacktivist groups and their tactics, turning early warning into action.

Sinority, a Bangkok security firm, put ASM and DRP to work against a related threat: scam and impersonation campaigns hitting Thai government and enterprise clients. Its CEO said the two products were “easy to deploy, highly effective,” with automated takedowns cutting phishing and impersonation sites and saving the time manual removal would have cost.

As hacktivist threats evolve, your vigilance should too. Get in touch with our experts today to enable digital risk protection for your business and stay protected from hacktivist attacks or other disruptive digital risks.